Would more players play if we purged?

I'm semi-motivated to code again, but have little motivation if nobody's playing...:-P

I'd be willing to find some builders and maybe another coder if there were more than 2 people on at any given time.

If you're voting, also give a brief explaination here as to why; and if you're the one who doesn't know what a purge is...die :P

Can't Purge Till I Get To Lvl 40 ^______^....And What If People Don't Come Back? =(

I'd play, whether purge or not, if I could find small segments of time worth it. This makes more sense at lower levels, where 15 minutes of play time can often equal a full level.

Also, if there was ever a decent Mac MUDding client that didn't require me to fire up parallels or VMWare and use Windows for ZMUD.

Burn it! Burn it all down!

Bodhi wrote:

Also, if there was ever a decent Mac MUDding client that didn't require me to fire up parallels or VMWare and use Windows for ZMUD.

Try out Mudlet. It's a little funky at times, but it's worked better for me compared to the rest of the options out there.

I voted "yes" for a few reasons:
1) I like playing levels 1-13 the most
2) The game is more fun when everyone sucks
3) To spite everyone who voted "no"

i said whats a purge because i like to be different

Carpathia wrote:

i said whats a purge because i like to be different

I don't think anyone would argue that you're not "different".

Don't purge!! I don't want to have to level my DM again.